Judge rejects Biden bid to block release of ghostwriter recordings, with temporary pause for appeal
The Facts
- U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich rejected Joe Biden’s attempt to block the Justice Department from releasing recordings and transcripts of his conversations with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer to the Heritage Foundation.
- Friedrich ruled that the public interest in the materials outweighed Biden’s privacy interests, and multiple reports say the Justice Department’s planned release would be redacted.
- The recordings were obtained during special counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into whether Biden improperly retained classified documents from his time as a senator and vice president.
- After Hur declined to file charges, Republicans in Congress sought the recordings, and the dispute over releasing them continued into litigation involving the Heritage Foundation.
- The ruling matters because it would allow the Justice Department to provide evidence tied to a high-profile investigation to a conservative group, and some reports say Congress could also receive the materials.
- Although Friedrich denied Biden’s request to stop disclosure, she also temporarily paused release for up to three weeks so he could appeal, meaning the recordings were not set for immediate public handover.
How left and right are reading this
- Both agree
- A judge found that redacted materials from a high-profile investigation can be released despite Biden’s privacy objections, while a temporary pause for appeal preserves process before any handover to the Heritage Foundation or possibly Congress.
- They split on
- Less a disagreement than a question of emphasis: the risk of sensitive investigative material moving into partisan and outside hands, versus the principle that even a former president’s privacy claim yields when public interest and ordinary disclosure process prevail.
Context
What are these recordings?
They are recordings and transcripts of Biden’s conversations with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer from around 2016 and 2017, created while working on Biden’s memoir and later obtained by investigators Independent,POLITICO,Washington Examiner.
Why did the judge allow release?
Friedrich said the public interest in the materials outweighed Biden’s privacy concerns, and reports say she viewed those privacy interests as reduced by the Justice Department’s redactions CBS News,POLITICO,TimesNow.
What happens next?
Biden’s lawyers said they would appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and the judge put her ruling on hold for up to three weeks so the appeals court can consider whether to intervene before any release occurs Niagara Falls Review,CBS News,Columbian.
Facts first. Then every angle.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief — the facts everyone agrees on, then the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.
View all 39 sources
Independent coverage (39)
About these frames
See this differently than someone you know would? Two ways to keep it going.
The dial works on any URL — paste an article you read elsewhere this week.