D.C. appeals court orders end to contempt inquiry over Venezuelan deportation flights
The Facts
- On Tuesday, a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered Judge James Boasberg to end his contempt inquiry into the Trump administration.
- The appeals court's decision was 2-1.
- The contempt inquiry concerned whether Trump administration officials violated Boasberg's order related to deportation flights carrying Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador.
- The underlying dispute stems from March 2025 deportation flights that Boasberg had ordered halted or turned around.
- The majority opinion was written by Judge Neomi Rao and joined by Judge Justin Walker.
- The majority said Boasberg abused his discretion in continuing the criminal contempt proceedings.
- Judge J. Michelle Childs dissented from the ruling.
Context
What was Judge Boasberg investigating?
He was pursuing a criminal contempt inquiry into whether Trump administration officials willfully defied his order concerning deportation flights of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador NYT,CBS News,U.S. News & World R….
What did the appeals court majority say?
The majority said Boasberg's contempt proceedings were an abuse of discretion and ordered him to terminate them Daily Mail,POLITICO,U.S. News & World R….
Why does this case matter?
Multiple outlets describe the fight as part of a broader clash over the limits of presidential power and the authority of courts in challenges to Trump's deportation policies NYT,U.S. News & World R…,PBS.org.
The receipts — all 100 sources
Wire services (14)
Independent coverage (50)
Facts first. Then every angle.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief — the facts everyone agrees on, then the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.