Blanche defends Justice Department lawsuit over Alaska Senate election certification
U.S. PoliticsWell-covered
|
The Facts
- The Justice Department sued over certification of Alaska's Senate election result if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses.
- The lawsuit cites possible voter confusion involving another Alaska Senate candidate named Dan Sullivan.
- Blanche defended the lawsuit during CNN's State of the Union on Sunday.
- Trump said he directed the Justice Department to file the lawsuit.
- Blanche said the administration was not trying to overturn Alaska's election results.
- Asked what crime was alleged, Blanche said one “could” exist but emphasized voter confusion.
- The lawsuit could affect whether Alaska certifies the Senate election outcome.
Context
What is the Justice Department arguing?
The department argues that the presence of another candidate named Dan Sullivan could confuse voters in Alaska's Senate race. Guardian POLITICO U.S. News & World R…
What did Blanche say about a possible crime?
Pressed by CNN host Dana Bash to identify a crime, Blanche said, “It depends” and that there “could be a crime,” but focused his response on alleged voter confusion. POLITICO HuffPost Yahoo News
What role did Trump say he played?
Trump said he was “the one that said do it” when asked about the Justice Department's lawsuit. Guardian U.S. News & World R… WDIV
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Both agree no crime has been identified, the suit only applies if Sullivan loses, and the stated justification is confusion between two candidates sharing the name Dan Sullivan.
- Where Left and Right split
- The left and the right split on whether the DOJ's Alaska suit blocks certification or checks voter confusion.
- Why they won’t converge
- The split is over trust in the Justice Department as an institution: whether a preemptive suit filed without a named crime is a legitimate safeguard against voter confusion or a tool to delay certification until a political outcome is known.
- Watch for
- Whether Sen. Dan Sullivan actually loses November's midterm race is the trigger condition the DOJ's lawsuit is built around, since the suit only seeks to block certification in that scenario.Yahoo News, The Independent
How left and right read it
Blanche could only say a crime "could" exist, resting instead on confusion over a second candidate named Dan Sullivan — yet the suit is contingent on one outcome, a loss by Sullivan, and Trump says he ordered it. That is not law enforcement. The pattern is familiar, and the demand is simple: drop the suit and let Alaska certify.
“Trump's efforts to block the certification of Alaska's U.S. Senate race if the Republican candidate doesn't win are reminiscent of the doubts he sowed before his 2020 election loss” — The Independent
A vote only counts as consent if the voter knew which man he was choosing, so a ballot offering two candidates named Dan Sullivan puts that basic act in question. Certification locks confusion in. That is why Blanche is right to press the point even without a crime nailed down: establishing whether Alaskans got the choice they intended matters more than hurrying the result onto the books.
Certifying Alaska's result now hinges on a lawsuit that only exists if Sullivan loses — the real fight is over what that timing proves.
The receipts — 13 sources
Wire services (2)
Independent coverage (11)
The news, read by both sides.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief, built to show both sides and the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.