Data on more than 40,000 DHS employees published online
|
The Facts
- Distributed Denial of Secrets published data on more than 40,000 Department of Homeland Security employees.
- The published records include personnel from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection.
- The records include employee names, phone numbers, email addresses, office locations, or job titles.
- The data includes information about DHS personnel working in surveillance and human intelligence.
- DHS said it was aware of a potential breach and was working to address it.
- DHS said it was working to protect affected employees and would provide updates when more information was available.
- Distributed Denial of Secrets said the data came from an entity calling itself the Department of Peace.
- The disclosure is the third government data leak to draw attention in the past month.
Context
What information was published?
The records include names, phone numbers, email addresses, office locations and job information for DHS personnel, including ICE and CBP staff. BBC Verge Wired
What is DHS doing?
DHS said it is aware of a potential breach, is working to address it, and is seeking to protect its employees. CBC News Jerusalem Post theepochtimes.com
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Publishing names, contacts, and office locations for over 40,000 DHS personnel — including surveillance and intelligence staff — in the third such leak this month is a real failure demanding more than pledges.
- Where Left and Right split
- The left and the right split on whether this leak proves DHS's security failure or marks an attack on its workforce.
- Why they won’t converge
- This is a trust-in-institution divide: whether DHS's duty is to safeguard the data of the enforcers it employs or to protect the legitimacy of the enforcement system itself, and that framing choice survives agreement on the leak's scope.
How left and right read it
A government that builds surveillance capacity owes a duty of care over the data it holds — including its own workforce. That duty is failing systemically. Contact details and office locations for more than 40,000 DHS employees are now public, down to personnel in surveillance and human intelligence, and this is the third such disclosure in a month — so beyond pledges to protect them, which systems has DHS secured?
“Information released by Distributed Denial of Secrets is the third such government data disclosure in the last month” — The Guardian
A nation that cannot shield the people who enforce its laws cannot enforce them for long — which is why publishing names, phone numbers, office locations and job titles for more than 40,000 DHS employees, down to those working in surveillance and human intelligence, is an attack on enforcement itself. That is not whistleblowing. DHS's pledge to protect those employees must mean finding whoever claimed credit.
“An anti-fascist hacking group claimed responsibility for doxxing personnel records of ICE and Border Patrol staff” — Fox News
The leaked data exposes a security failure to the left, and an attack on enforcement to the right.
The receipts — 59 sources
Wire services (4)
Independent coverage (55)
The news, read by both sides.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief, built to show both sides and the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.