Michigan's Democratic Senate Primary Too Close to Call, With El-Sayed Narrowly Ahead of Stevens
The Facts
- Michigan's Democratic Senate primary between Abdul El-Sayed and Representative Haley Stevens was too close to call in the early hours of Wednesday, with El-Sayed holding a narrow lead as votes continued to be counted.
- With more than 95% of the statewide vote counted, El-Sayed had about 49.5% and Stevens about 45.8%, according to tallies reported early Wednesday.
- The winner of the primary will face Republican Mike Rogers in November for the seat being vacated by retiring Democratic Senator Gary Peters, in a contest that could help determine which party controls the U.S. Senate.
- The race was widely described as a contest between the Democratic Party's progressive wing and its establishment, drawing national attention and involvement from prominent figures in both camps.
- Stevens, 43, a fourth-term congresswoman from Birmingham, Mich., is the preferred candidate of Democratic leaders in Washington and Michigan; she was endorsed by Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Senator Gary Peters, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer asked donors to support her.
- El-Sayed, 41, a former public health official from Ann Arbor who was born in Detroit to Egyptian immigrant parents, is supported by progressive figures including Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and would be the first Muslim U.S. senator if elected in November.
- Outside groups spent heavily on Stevens's behalf, including the super PAC arm of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee; The New York Times, citing the tracking firm AdImpact, put outside advertising for Stevens at about $62 million, roughly a 9-to-1 advantage over El-Sayed and his allies.
- The close result defied pre-primary polls that had shown El-Sayed with double-digit leads, and El-Sayed's campaign manager said the margin was narrower than expected.
- Both candidates addressed supporters overnight and said counting could continue well into the following day, with Stevens telling supporters, "We knew that this was going to be a close race, and that's exactly what we've got."
Context
Why is the result still unresolved?
Votes were still being tabulated across the state, with many of the early returns coming from ballots cast in advance infobae. El-Sayed told supporters, "I wish I could tell you that I was declaring victory right about now. Turns out it takes a long time to count votes in Michigan" NY Post. CBS News described the race overnight as leaning toward El-Sayed, but it had not been called by major outlets Aol Guardian.
Why does this primary matter beyond Michigan?
Michigan is a battleground state that Democrats consider essential to any path back to a Senate majority in the November 3 midterms, so the nominee's general-election strength against Mike Rogers carries national stakes Guardian Le Figaro.fr infobae. The race also functioned as a test of whether progressive wins in urban congressional primaries this cycle could translate to a statewide swing-state contest NYT Yahoo!.
What did voters say was motivating them?
Limited pre-primary polling indicated the Democratic primary electorate was focused mainly on the economy and President Trump, with issues related to Israel, Gaza or AIPAC not appearing among voters' top stated concerns, even though the campaign was often framed as a referendum on those subjects NYT.
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Establishment endorsements and a roughly nine-to-one outside spending advantage failed to deliver Stevens a clear win, leaving El-Sayed narrowly ahead with more than 95% counted.
- Where Left and Right split
- $62 million in outside money nearly overriding voter preference, or a party unable to give either faction a majority before facing Mike Rogers.
How left and right read it
Outside groups spent roughly $62 million on Haley Stevens's behalf — about a nine-to-one advantage, including the super PAC arm of AIPAC — and Democratic leaders from Gretchen Whitmer to Chuck Schumer lined up behind her. Abdul El-Sayed still led narrowly with more than 95% counted. That gap between donor muscle and voter preference is the whole point: nominations should be won on the ground, not bought.
“Dr. El-Sayed, who accuses Israel of carrying out a genocide in Gaza, has focused on tying her to AIPAC, an organization many Democrats view with deep skepticism.” — The New York Times
El-Sayed at 49.5 to Stevens's 45.8, with more than 95% counted — a party that cannot clear 50 percent for either wing is a party still arguing with itself about what it believes. Whitmer, Peters, and Schumer backed Stevens; Ocasio-Cortez backed El-Sayed. Whoever emerges faces Mike Rogers with Senate control in the balance. So which faction actually owns this nomination, and can it hold a coalition together by November?
“The race had been seen by El-Sayed's backers as a battle for "the soul of the Democratic Party," and the far-left's attempt to prove that their candidates are just as electable, if not more, than centrist Dems.” — New York Post
The receipts — 100 sources
Wire services (1)
Independent coverage (99)
The news, read by both sides.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief, built to show both sides and the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.