IAEA Prepares to Remove Nuclear Material From Covert Syrian Site Under US-Brokered Deal, Axios Reports
The Facts
- Axios reported, citing unnamed US and Israeli officials, that the IAEA will soon remove nuclear material from a clandestine Syrian facility referred to as "Site 99" after the Trump administration reached understandings with Damascus and Israel.
- The IAEA and Syria's government signed an agreement on removing the material roughly three weeks before the reports, after months of behind-the-scenes negotiations.
- The material is described as yellowcake — a uranium concentrate produced from uranium ore and used in early stages of the nuclear fuel cycle — along with other remnants of the Al-Kibar reactor project.
- US officials said the material cannot be used to build a nuclear weapon, but could be dispersed with conventional explosives in a radiological device commonly called a "dirty bomb."
- Israel bombed a suspected nuclear reactor at Al-Kibar in Syria's eastern Deir al-Zor province in 2007, and did not publicly acknowledge the strike until 2018.
- According to the reporting, Israeli officials warned the United States that Israel could strike the site if the material was not removed or if Syrian authorities tried to access it.
- US officials pursued a diplomatic route rather than military action in part to prevent an escalation involving Israel, Syria and potentially Turkey over the site.
- Syria's Atomic Energy Commission announced on August 11 that an IAEA delegation would visit the country in the coming days to announce "significant progress" on the nuclear file, without giving further details.
- The removal operation had not yet begun as of the reports, with officials saying they hoped to start soon and complete it by the end of the year.
- The IAEA has reported finding traces of uranium during its investigation of the Deir al-Zor site.
Context
What is "Site 99" and what was reportedly stored there?
Site 99 is a covert facility where, according to US and Israeli officials cited by Axios, the government of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad stored yellowcake uranium concentrate and other material left over from the Al-Kibar reactor project after that reactor was destroyed in 2007 RT,Hürriyet,Haber7.com. Some reporting says the Al-Kibar reactor was built with North Korean assistance and modeled on a North Korean design donga.com,경향신문. Sources also report that Israeli forces bombed entrances to the site after the change of power in Syria to block access to the material RT,Московский ….
Why did Syria's new government agree to the removal?
Syria's authorities, under interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, agreed to let the IAEA secure and remove the material as Israel threatened further strikes on the site donga.com,Hurriyet Daily News. Since Assad's ouster in late 2024, Syria's new authorities have publicly committed to working with the UN nuclear watchdog to address the legacy of nuclear activities under Assad family rule U.S. News & World R…,Jerusalem Post.
How solid is the reporting, and what remains unresolved?
The account of the deal originates with a single outlet, Axios, citing unnamed Israeli and US officials, and the negotiations were described as having been kept secret and not previously reported NEWS.am,Times of Israel,Jerusalem Post. Neither the exact quantity of material nor the timetable has been officially detailed, and the removal had not started at the time of the reports Hürriyet,Российская …. Syria's Atomic Energy Commission confirmed only that an IAEA delegation would visit to announce "significant progress," without providing further specifics U.S. News & World R…,Jerusalem Post.
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Yellowcake and Al-Kibar remnants that could feed a dirty bomb are leaving Syria under a signed IAEA agreement instead of under another airstrike — an outcome both read as good.
- Where Left and Right split
- Whether the story is about inspectors and quiet negotiation resolving a radiological risk, or about an explicit Israeli strike threat being the thing that made Damascus sign.
How left and right read it
Radiological danger near civilians gets resolved by inspectors and paperwork, not airstrikes. Months of quiet negotiation produced a signed agreement with the IAEA to remove yellowcake and Al-Kibar remnants — material that could feed a dirty bomb — while a strike on the site remained on the table and the diplomatic route was chosen partly to keep Israel, Syria and Turkey from escalating. Fund that machinery, and use it first.
Leverage, not goodwill, moved that yellowcake. Israel bombed Al-Kibar in 2007 and told Washington plainly it could hit Site 99 again if the material stayed or Damascus tried to reach it — and only then did months of quiet talks produce a signed removal agreement with the IAEA. Buried assets and a credible strike threat set the table. So what keeps Damascus honest after the inspectors go home?
“The site had been buried as part of Israel's blistering air campaign in the days following the collapse of Assad, which sought to destroy dangerous assets of the government that could fall into the hands of the rebels.” — Washington Examiner
The receipts — all 91 sources
Wire services (2)
Independent coverage (50)
Facts first. Then every angle.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief — the facts everyone agrees on, then the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.