US weighs restoring Turkey’s access to F-35 jets as S-400 talks continue
The Facts
- Trump said he would lift US sanctions on Turkey and indicated openness to restoring Turkey’s access to F-35 fighter jets.
- Turkey was removed from the F-35 program after acquiring the Russian-made S-400 air defense system, which triggered US sanctions and objections tied to protecting sensitive F-35 technology.
- Multiple reports say Turkey is discussing selling or transferring its S-400 system to a third country or Gulf state as part of efforts to clear the way for sanctions relief and a possible return to the F-35 program.
- Qatar and the United Arab Emirates have been identified in reports as possible destinations for Turkey’s S-400 system, but no completed transfer has been officially confirmed.
- The possible restoration of F-35 sales to Turkey has raised concern in Israel and Greece over the regional security implications.
- US congressional opposition remains a major unresolved hurdle, with lawmakers and reports citing the continued presence of the S-400 system as the key condition blocking Turkey’s return to the F-35 program.
Context
Why was Turkey blocked from the F-35 program in the first place?
Turkey was removed after buying Russia’s S-400 air defense system. US officials argued that operating the S-400 alongside the F-35 could expose sensitive information about the aircraft’s capabilities, and sanctions followed under the CAATSA framework RFI,Aviation Week,Euractiv.
What would have to happen for Turkey to get F-35s again?
Reports say the main condition is resolving the S-400 issue, with discussions focused on Turkey transferring or selling the system to another country. Even if that happens, congressional and legal obstacles in Washington could still slow or block any deal Aviation Week,Ekathimerini,ExBulletin.
Why does this matter beyond US-Turkey relations?
The issue affects the military balance and security calculations in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Greece and Israel have voiced concern about the implications of Turkey regaining access to advanced US fighter jets, while the S-400 transfer question also raises broader security concerns because potential Gulf buyers host US bases and operate American systems Ekathimerini,Ekathimerini,Euractiv.
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Sanctions tied to the S-400 were meant to protect sensitive F-35 technology, and restoring access before that condition is clearly resolved would weaken the original safeguard.
- Where Left and Right split
- Whether the story is about resisting transactional end-runs around security accountability, or about enforcing a clear rule that Turkey must actually remove the S-400 first.
How left and right read it
What stands out here is how easily high-stakes security policy can start to look like a workaround exercise: sanctions tied to protecting sensitive technology may be lifted, while reports describe moving the S-400 to another country to clear the path back to the F-35 program. With congressional opposition unresolved and regional concerns already raised, this is a reminder that accountability and long-term stability should matter more than transactional fixes.
The core issue is whether the original condition for exclusion is actually being met, not waved away. Turkey was removed from the program because of the S-400, and Congress still treats that system’s continued presence as the key unresolved barrier; until there is a confirmed transfer, reopening access to the F-35 risks turning a clear rule into a negotiable one.
The receipts — all 19 sources
Wire services (1)
Independent coverage (18)
Facts first. Then every angle.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief — the facts everyone agrees on, then the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.