DOE selects five states to explore hosting U.S. nuclear waste facilities
How left and right are reading this
- Both agree
- A stalled one-site strategy has left radioactive waste sitting at plant sites, and any new hosting plan still requires more approvals before facilities can open.
- They split on
- Whether the story is about protecting communities from taking on more nuclear risk before a durable solution exists, or breaking a long-stalled waste strategy to expand nuclear energy.
The Facts
- The Department of Energy selected five states—Utah, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Idaho—to further explore hosting nuclear-related facilities that could include storage or disposition of used nuclear fuel.
- DOE said it signed memorandums of agreement with the five states as part of the selection process.
- The administration is linking the waste-storage initiative to a broader push to expand the U.S. nuclear energy sector.
- The selected states have Republican governors, and AP reported that those governors said they support the effort in exchange for federal help developing nuclear energy and jobs.
- The U.S. has more than 95,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste, much of it currently stored at active or former nuclear plant sites.
- The plan would mark a shift away from relying only on Yucca Mountain in Nevada, whose development as a permanent repository has been stalled by long-running opposition.
- Further action is still needed before any facility opens, including federal approvals and, according to reports on the administration blueprint, potential changes to federal law.
Context
What exactly did DOE announce?
DOE said it chose five states—Utah, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Idaho—and signed memorandums of agreement with them to explore possible nuclear lifecycle campuses that could include used-fuel storage or other fuel-cycle functions Hill,POLITICO.
Why is nuclear waste storage such a central issue here?
A long-term disposal solution for U.S. spent nuclear fuel has been unresolved for decades. AP reported that more than 95,000 metric tons of spent fuel and radioactive waste exist nationwide, and much of it is currently stored at reactor sites because Yucca Mountain has not moved forward Yahoo! Finance,U.S. News & World R….
Does this mean new waste sites will open soon?
No. The selected states are being explored as potential hosts, and reports say additional approvals are required; some accounts also say the administration wants Congress to change federal law to support a willing-state approach Deseret News,POLITICO,Independent.
Facts first. Then every angle.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief — the facts everyone agrees on, then the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.
View all 104 sources
Wire services (7)
Independent coverage (50)
About these frames
See this differently than someone you know would? Two ways to keep it going.
The dial works on any URL — paste an article you read elsewhere this week.