Nature study finds many coastal sea-level risk assessments used underestimated baseline water heights
The Facts
- The findings were published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
- The researchers reviewed hundreds of scientific studies and hazard/risk assessments and concluded that most underestimated baseline coastal water heights.
- The study estimates that about 90% of the reviewed assessments underestimated baseline coastal water heights.
- Across locations, the study reports an average underestimation of roughly 30 centimeters (about 1 foot).
- Multiple reports say the underestimation problem is more frequent in the Global South, including the Pacific and Southeast Asia, than in Europe and along Atlantic coasts.
- The study and coverage attribute the underestimation to inconsistencies or mismatches in how sea level and land elevation are measured and referenced (vertical datums/altitude reference surfaces).
- The research suggests the discrepancy could materially affect estimates of coastal flooding exposure and related planning for climate-change-driven sea-level rise.
Context
What exactly does the study say was underestimated?
It says many assessments used a baseline coastal water height that was too low—meaning the starting point for estimating flooding and exposure was underestimated, by about 30 cm on average across the reviewed work. Weather Channel Guardian Hindu
Why does the study say this underestimation happens?
Coverage of the study says the error often comes from mismatches in how sea level and land elevation are measured and referenced—using different vertical reference surfaces (datums) or models that don’t align with observed local sea surface heights. Weather Channel DIE WELT as
Where does the study indicate the problem is most pronounced?
Reports say it is more frequent in parts of the Global South—particularly the Pacific and Southeast Asia/Indo-Pacific—while being less common in Europe and along Atlantic coasts. Weather Channel Guardian NBC News
Facts first. Then every angle.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief — the facts everyone agrees on, then the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.
View all 81 sources
Wire services (3)
Independent coverage (50)
About these frames
See this differently than someone you know would? Two ways to keep it going.
The dial works on any URL — paste an article you read elsewhere this week.