US backs proposal to resume Russian gas transit through Ukraine to Europe
|
The Facts
- The US is backing a proposal to resume Russian natural-gas sales to Europe through Ukraine.
- The proposal is linked to negotiations for an energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine.
- Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff discussed the proposal during September visits to Moscow and Kyiv.
- The plan would sell Russian gas through a US intermediary.
- EU legislation requires purchases of Russian natural gas to end by the end of 2027.
- Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said current conditions make renewed transit through Ukraine impossible.
Context
How would the proposed gas arrangement work?
Russian natural gas would travel through pipelines crossing Ukraine and be sold to European buyers through a US intermediary; reports say this could potentially bypass European sanctions. WSJ Times of India News18
Why is the proposal politically difficult?
The EU has legislation requiring an end to Russian natural-gas purchases by the end of 2027, and European governments have opposed renewed dependence on Russian energy. Times of India Independent Hindustan Times
Could the gas transit resume immediately?
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said conditions on the ground currently make restarting gas transit through Ukraine impossible. РИА Новости
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Both frame the gas-transit proposal as a bargaining chip valued only insofar as it secures a durable ceasefire, not as an end in itself.
- Where Left and Right split
- The left and the right split on whether gas transit trades away Ukraine's sacrifice or buys US leverage.
- Why they won’t converge
- The divide is values-based: one side weighs near-term leverage toward ending the war against the other's weighting of durable energy independence over a revenue-driven ceasefire bargain.
- Watch for
- Trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi are scheduled for mid-November, which would show whether the energy-ceasefire push produces any concrete agreement before winter.The Independent
How left and right read it
The people who would bear the cost are not the envoys who met in Moscow and Kyiv; they are the Ukrainians who spent last winter in the cold and dark. So who, exactly, has to prove that reopening this revenue stream buys anything more durable than the phaseout already on the books?
“Last winter saw Russian strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure take a heavy toll on daily life across Ukraine, with millions left without power and heating as temperatures fell below zero.” — The Independent
Ending this war is worth more than preserving a purchasing schedule, and the proposal on the table is tied directly to an energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. Routing sales through a US intermediary means Washington holds the valve rather than Moscow, which is leverage America does not currently have. Press it anyway — a ceasefire that American hands can enforce is the thing worth bargaining for.
Reopening the pipeline turns gas into leverage - its worth measured only by whether it buys a ceasefire that lasts.
The receipts — 100 sources
Wire services (1)
Independent coverage (99)
The news, read by both sides.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief, built to show both sides and the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.