U.S. imposes new 10% to 12.5% tariffs on imports from dozens of trading partners
The Facts
- The U.S. has imposed new tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on imports from about 60 trading partners.
- Countries affected include major U.S. trading partners such as the European Union, Canada, Japan, India and China.
- The new tariffs replace a temporary 10% global tariff that was due to expire this week.
- The administration says the tariffs are being imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 in response to trading partners' failure to prohibit or effectively enforce bans on goods produced with forced labour.
- The new action follows a Supreme Court ruling earlier this year that many of Trump's previous global tariffs had been imposed illegally, prompting the administration to seek another legal basis for tariffs.
- The tariffs took effect as the earlier temporary duties expired, allowing the administration to continue broad import levies without immediate congressional approval under the previous mechanism.
- The measures affect a large share of U.S. imports, with multiple reports saying the covered countries account for roughly 99% of U.S. imports or trade.
Context
Why did the administration issue a new round of tariffs now?
The earlier temporary 10% global tariff was expiring, and the administration moved to replace it after the Supreme Court ruled that many earlier Trump tariffs had been enacted illegally. Several reports say the White House turned to Section 301 as an alternative legal basis. NYT,BBC,Guardian,Guardian
What reason has the U.S. given for these tariffs?
U.S. officials say the tariffs are tied to trading partners' failure to prohibit or effectively enforce restrictions on imports of goods made with forced labour. The duties were announced by U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. Guardian,Hindustan Times,NDTV
What remains unclear?
Reports indicate the tariffs extend Trump's broader trade policy after a legal setback, but they also leave open how affected countries will respond in negotiations or retaliation and whether the new legal approach will face further challenges. Investing.com,Guardian,News18
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Broad new tariffs now cover nearly all U.S. imports, extending sweeping levies after the earlier temporary duties expired under a new legal rationale.
- Where Left and Right split
- The left and the right split on whether these tariffs are mainly about executive power or forced-labour leverage.
How left and right read it
The administration imposed new tariffs of 10% to 12.5% on imports from about 60 trading partners, including the European Union, Canada, Japan, India and China, replacing a temporary global tariff as it expired. After the Supreme Court ruled many earlier tariffs illegal, it found a new legal path to keep broad levies covering roughly all U.S. imports in place. The central issue is still unchecked executive power over costs that reach nearly everything.
“the stakes of Mr. Trump's tariffs remain unchanged.” — The New York Times
About 60 trading partners now face tariffs of 10% to 12.5%, including the European Union, Canada, Japan, India and China. That matters because the administration is using Section 301 to answer trading partners’ failure to stop goods made with forced labour while keeping broad levies in place as the temporary tariff expired. If nearly all U.S. imports are covered, will allies and rivals finally face real reciprocity?
This is less a story about the tariff rate than about what tariffs are for: unchecked presidential power or pressure on trading partners.
The receipts — 100 sources
Wire services (6)
Independent coverage (94)
The news, read by both sides.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief, built to show both sides and the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.