25 US States Sue Trump Administration Over Section 301 Tariffs on 60 Trading Partners
The Facts
- Twenty-five U.S. states, nearly all led by Democrats, filed suit against the Trump administration on Monday in the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York over its latest round of tariffs.
- The challenged duties, imposed on July 24 under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, range from 10% to 12.5% and cover 60 trading partners — described in some accounts as 59 countries plus the European Union.
- The administration justified the tariffs by saying the targeted economies had not done enough to stop imports of goods produced with forced labor.
- The states are asking the court to halt the tariffs, declare them unlawful and order the government to refund duties importers have already paid.
- According to the states' filing, the 60 economies covered by the tariffs account for 99.4% of U.S. imports, and the states argue the duties will raise costs for consumers and businesses nationwide.
- The states argue the new tariffs are a pretext for replacing import taxes the U.S. Supreme Court struck down in February, and that there is "no rational fit" between forced labor in supply chains and blanket global tariffs imposed by the U.S. Trade Representative.
- The lawsuit also alleges the administration failed to conduct the country-specific investigations and justification that Section 301 requires before imposing tariffs.
- The state suit follows earlier challenges by small U.S. businesses, which sued on the day the new tariffs took effect; states and businesses have won previous cases against Trump's global tariffs, but the administration has continued imposing new ones.
Context
What is Section 301, and why is the administration using it now?
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 authorizes the president to impose tariffs and other sanctions on countries found to engage in unfair trade practices Aol,CBS News. The administration turned to it after the Supreme Court in February struck down tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), and after the temporary 10% global levies used in the interim expired on July 24 Guardian,News18,mint.
How has the administration responded to the lawsuit?
White House spokesman Kush Desai said the United States is "using its lawful authority" to address practices that burden American businesses, adding that foreign countries' failure to deal with the importation of goods produced with forced labor was "unreasonable" and must be addressed BBC.
Which countries are affected, and what happens next?
The tariffs cover 60 economies including the United Kingdom, China, the European Union and India BBC,Hindustan Times,India Today. India currently faces a 10% rate under the Section 301 measures, with a separate investigation that could lead to additional tariffs still pending Hindustan Times,India Today. The Court of International Trade has not yet ruled on the states' requests to halt the duties or order refunds Guardian,Yahoo! Finance.
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Duties of 10% to 12.5% now touch nearly every source of U.S. imports, and the money is paid domestically by importers — a cost neither framing disputes is real.
- Where Left and Right split
- An executive reimposing struck-down import taxes without the investigations the statute requires, or who holds America's trade leverage — the presidency or the courts.
How left and right read it
Ninety-nine point four percent of U.S. imports fall under duties of 10% to 12.5% — a cost that lands on households and small businesses, not on the sixty economies named. Invoking forced labor to justify blanket tariffs is cynicism dressed as conscience, and the filing says the country-specific investigations Section 301 requires were never done. Courts already struck these taxes down in February. How many rulings does a president get to ignore?
“The blatantly specious accusation, sitting uneasily alongside America's own state-sanctioned abuse of forced labor, underscored how low Trump will stoop to get his way on trade.” — The Guardian
Twenty-five Democratic-led states went to the Court of International Trade on Monday, asking judges to halt duties of 10% to 12.5% and refund what importers have already paid. The stated ground is reciprocity: sixty economies did not do enough to stop imports of goods made with forced labor. That bargaining leverage is the executive's. Who negotiates for America matters more than who litigates against it.
“The Trump administration was sued by 25 Democratic-led states over the president's latest round of global tariffs, arguing that it was trying to use a different legal authority to resurrect a policy the Supreme Court had struck down.” — Washington Examiner
The receipts — 100 sources
Wire services (8)
Independent coverage (92)
The news, read by both sides.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief, built to show both sides and the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.