Supreme Court upholds Mississippi law allowing some mail ballots to arrive after Election Day
The Facts
- The Supreme Court upheld Mississippi’s law allowing certain mail ballots to be counted after Election Day.
- The Mississippi law allows ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they are received up to five business days later.
- The court ruled 5-4 in the case.
- Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s three liberal justices.
- The court held that federal statutes setting Election Day do not bar states from counting ballots that were cast by Election Day but arrive later.
- The case was brought by Republicans challenging Mississippi’s grace-period law, including the Republican National Committee.
- The ruling has implications beyond Mississippi because other states also have laws allowing some late-arriving mail ballots to be counted.
- The decision leaves unresolved the broader political fight over mail voting, with President Donald Trump criticizing the ruling after it was issued.
Context
What exactly did the court decide?
The court said federal laws establishing Election Day do not prevent states from counting mail ballots that were cast by that day but arrive afterward, so Mississippi’s grace-period law can remain in effect POLITICO,Aol,CBS News.
Why does this matter outside Mississippi?
Multiple reports say other states also allow some late-arriving mail ballots to count, so the ruling helps preserve similar rules elsewhere as election officials prepare for the midterms NYT,BBC,WSJ.
Does this change voting rules in every state?
No. States without a grace-period law are not automatically affected. For example, Wisconsin still requires absentee ballots to be in clerks’ hands by 8 p.m. on Election Day Journal Sentinel,CBS News.
Where Left and Right agree, and where they split
- Where Left and Right agree
- Ballots cast by Election Day can still be counted under state law when mail delays push delivery later, and federal Election Day statutes do not forbid it.
- Where Left and Right split
- Protecting voters from disenfranchisement caused by mail delays, or preserving state authority when federal law sets no national rule.
How left and right read it
Left says
What matters here is that the court preserved a state rule that counts ballots cast by Election Day even if mail delivery takes up to five business days, and it made clear federal law does not forbid that. In a system where access can turn on logistics people do not control, that is a meaningful protection against disenfranchisement, with consequences extending beyond Mississippi because other states use similar rules.
Right says
What matters here is the court’s holding that federal Election Day statutes do not override a state’s decision to count ballots cast by Election Day and received within a defined five-business-day window. For readers who care about federalism and judicial restraint, the significance is less the policy itself than the court’s refusal to invent a national rule where the statute does not supply one, especially since the ruling reaches beyond Mississippi.
The receipts — 100 sources
Wire services (5)
Independent coverage (95)
Journal SentinelWhy Supreme Court decision on mail-in ballots doesn't affect...
Chicago TribuneEditorial: The Supreme Court protected states' rights. But I...
The Daily BeastStephen Miller Melts Down at SCOTUS Justices After Crushing ...
www.theepochtimes.comKey Takeaways From Supreme Court Ruling on Late-Arriving Bal...
Economic Times'Gives people more time to vote illegally...': Trump hits ou...
RTUS Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot challenge -- RT W...
The Jerusalem PostUS Supreme Court endorses grace periods for mail-in ballots
The Boston GlobeSupreme Court's decision on mail-in ballots deals a new blow...
PJ MediaThe Morning Briefing: We Regret to Inform You That Election ...
The New York TimesCalifornia Hopes to Speed Up Election Results With $40 Milli...
New York PostSupreme Court decision on late ballots underlines need for v...
POLITICOTrump's election crusade hits another wall at the Supreme Co...
ABC7 ChicagoIllinoisans praise mail-in ballot decision, affirming electi...
BreitbartTrump: SAVE Act 'Even More Important' After SCOTUS Mail-In B...
Slate MagazineThe Supreme Court Came One Vote Away From Embracing Trump's ...
The Wall Street JournalOpinion | Liberal Wins on Mail Votes and 'Geofencing'
Los Angeles TimesPentagon Reacts to Absentee Ballot Outcry
San Francisco ChronicleCalifornia budget deal includes $29M to speed up vote-counti...
CNN InternationalThe Supreme Court handed Trump an election case defeat. Is a...
ClevelandSupreme Court upholds absentee ballot grace periods, but law...
Fox NewsAlito blasts latest SCOTUS ballot ruling as invitation to 'v...
Raw StoryTrump may have gotten a backdoor from Supreme Court to attac...
Chicago TribuneUS Supreme Court upholds laws allowing Illinois and other st...
alOdds of Trump making this unprecedented decision skyrocket o...
The New York TimesSupreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Gran...
news24US court allows tallying of mail-in ballots after election d...
Oregon LiveOregon, Washington can continue counting ballots that arrive...
ThePrintUS top court says mail votes can arrive after election day
CBC NewsU.S. Supreme Court rejects Trump-led challenge against mail-...
The Philadelphia InquirerSupreme Court rules mail-in ballots arriving after Election ...
New York PostExclusive | Right ignites after stunning SCOTUS ruling on Ca...
Los Angeles TimesCalifornia leaders cheer Supreme Court ballot ruling while e...
Fox NewsConservatives revolt after Trump-appointed Barrett joins lib...
Slate MagazineThe Supreme Court Rejected a Bonkers Idea About Voting by a ...
Anadolu AjansıUS Supreme Court upholds state grace periods for late-arrivi...
Raw StoryMAGA insiders go berserk as Supreme Court ruling 'totally sc...
News18'Tremendous Loss': Trump Blasts US Supreme Court's Ruling Al...
POLITICOCalifornia Dems claim win over Trump in Supreme Court ruling...
MilitarySupreme Court Mail-In Election Ballot Decision Impact on 1.3...
Raw StorySamuel Alito shamed as 'braindead Fox News viewer' for disse...
The Boston Globe'Today's decision will only exacerbate voters' distrust,' Ju...
The Irish TimesUS supreme court endorses grace periods for mail-in ballots
VoxThe Supreme Court rejects the GOP's attempt to trash thousan...
FortuneOne of Trump's Supreme Court appointees just saved the late ...
NewsMaxTrump: Supreme Court Ruling Shows Need for SAVE America Act
mintUS Supreme Court delivers blow to Trump over mail-in ballots...
CBS NewsSupreme Court says states can count mail ballots that arrive...
The Daily BeastMAGA Melts Down at Trump Justice for Vetoing Election Ploy
The Daily CallerSamuel Alito Warns Mail-In-Ballot Ruling Leaves Giant Openin...
Star TribuneMinnesota mail-in ballots still must be received by Election...
MediaiteFox's Jonathan Turley Argues Supreme Court Just Handed Down ...
The IndependentTrump rages over Supreme Court mail-in ballots smackdown: 'C...
TheBlazeAlito torches SCOTUS ruling in mail-in ballot case, warns of...
BBCUS Supreme Court allows late-arriving mail-in ballots in def...
U.S. News & World ReportSupreme Court Ruling Gives a Reprieve to States With Grace P...
San Francisco ChronicleIn major win for California, SCOTUS says states can count ba...
Raw StoryAlito throws Amy Coney Barrett's own line back at her as rig...
TownhallAmy Coney Barrett and John Roberts Betrayed Us the on Mail-i...
Zero HedgeSupreme Court Allows Late Receipt Of Ballots During Election...
BreitbartSCOTUS Permits Counting of Mail-In Ballots that Arrive After...
Oregon LiveSupreme Court rejects Trump-led challenge, rules states can ...
TownhallJustice Alito Wrote a Scathing Dissent in the Supreme Court'...
The Globe and MailSupreme Court rejects Trump-led challenge, rules states can ...
The Philadelphia InquirerSupreme Court rules states can count late-arriving mailed ba...
Raw StorySupreme Court blocks Trump's attack on mail-in ballots
AolSupreme Court says states can count mail ballots that arrive...
AxiosSupreme Court upholds grace period for late-arriving mail-in...
The Daily WireConservative Justices Join Liberals To Deal Major Blow To El...
Los Angeles TimesStates may continue to count late-arriving mail ballots, Sup...
NewsweekSupreme Court hands GOP major election defeat over mail-in b...
NewsMaxSupreme Court Endorses Grace Periods for Mail-In Ballots
HuffPostSupreme Court Slaps Down Republicans' Attempt At Dismissing ...
Yahoo NewsSupreme Court Slaps Down Republicans' Attempt At Dismissing ...
The New York TimesSupreme Court Upholds Mississippi Late-Arriving Mail-In Ball...
CBS NewsSupreme Court says states can count mail ballots that arrive...
Fox NewsSupreme Court rules on mail-in ballots received after Electi...
The Wall Street JournalSupreme Court Lets States Count Mailed Ballots Received Afte...
CBS NewsSupreme Court says states can count mail ballots that arrive...
POLITICOSupreme Court rejects Trump's challenge to counting late mai...
The HillSupreme Court rules states can accept mail ballots after Ele...
CBS NewsSupreme Court says states can count mail ballots that arrive...
NBC NewsSupreme Court allows states to count mail-in ballots that ar...
New York PostSupreme Court rules ballots arriving after Election Day can ...
PJ MediaAlito Warns Supreme Court Just Opened Pandora's Box for Elec...
PJ MediaThe Supreme Court Just Californicated Our Elections
PJ MediaSupreme Court Decides Crucial Mail-in Ballot Case
HotAirStunner: SCOTUS Whiffs on Election Day Showdown, 5-4
TwitchyDemocrats Are VERY Excited About SCOTUS' Ruling on Mail-in B...
RedstateMississippi's Election Law Is Upheld in SCOTUS Decision on '...
TownhallThe Supreme Court's Mail-in Ballot Ruling Is Not Going to Pl...
www.theepochtimes.comSupreme Court Upholds State Law Allowing Late Receipt of Bal...
The New RepublicMAGA Erupts as Even Amy Coney Barrett Rules Republicans Went...
ArcaMaxSupreme Court allows late-arriving mail ballots, leaving Cal...
ArcaMaxCalifornia leaders cheer Supreme Court ballot ruling while e...
Hindustan TimesWhat did the USPS Postmaster General say about mail-in votin...
Facts first. Then every angle.
The day’s biggest stories in one short brief — the facts everyone agrees on, then the competing values behind the headlines. Free in your inbox.